Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Steven Marsh v. Jerry Goodwin, Warden
as 20-30053
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN MARSH
Respondent / Appellee:
JERRY GOODWIN, WARDEN, DAVID WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Robert Collins v. LA Dept of Pub Sfty and Corr, et al
as 19-31065
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERY BRUCE FULLER, JOHN BEL EDWARDS, JAMES M. LEBLANC, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT COLLINS
James Townsend v. Jerry Goodwin, et al
as 19-30990
Defendant / Appellee:
TAMMIE WYNN, JERRY GOODWIN, WARDEN, DAVID WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, KAYLA SHERMAN, Assistant Warden, David Wade Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES TOWNSEND
Robert McCartney v. Jerry Goodwin, Warden
as 19-30933
Respondent / Appellee:
JERRY GOODWIN, WARDEN, DAVID WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT KEVIN MCCARTNEY
David Manning, Jr. v. Jerry Goodwin, Warden
as 19-30847
Respondent / Appellee:
JERRY GOODWIN, WARDEN, DAVID WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID J. MANNING, JR.
Ashton Davis v. Jerry Goodwin, Warden
as 19-30813
Petitioner / Appellant:
ASHTON DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
JERRY GOODWIN, WARDEN, DAVID WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Michael Hill v. Jerry Goodwin, Warden
as 19-30413
Respondent / Appellee:
JERRY GOODWIN, WARDEN, DAVID WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL HILL
Johnny Thompson, Jr. v. Jerry Goodwin, Warden
as 19-30351
Respondent / Appellee:
JERRY GOODWIN, WARDEN, DAVID WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHNNY THOMPSON, JR.
Shuneal Mathis v. Jerry Goodwin, Warden
as 19-30310
Respondent / Appellee:
JERRY GOODWIN, WARDEN, DAVID WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHUNEAL O. MATHIS
Larry Lewis v. Jerry Goodwin, et al
as 19-30250
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY LEWIS
Defendant / Appellee:
JERRY GOODWIN, KAYLA SHERMAN, DOCTOR HEARNE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
