Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Williams v. Stewart et al
as 1:2018cv00343
Defendant:
Borg, Frahs, Elison and others
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnny Andoe v. Kevin Kemph, et al
as 18-35527
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY R. ANDOE
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN KEMPH, Director, KEITH YORDY, Warden, Warden, MARK OLSON, Deputy Attorney General and others
Williams v. Stewart et al
as 1:2018cv00028
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Alan Stewart, Yordy, Jill Whittington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gallegos v. Corizon LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00525
Plaintiff:
Andy Gallegos
Defendant:
Corizon LLC, Aaron Hofer, Murray Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Field et al
as 1:2017cv00337
Plaintiff:
Juan Martinez
Defendant:
Debbie Field, David McCluskey, Cindy Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnny Andoe v. Kevin Kemph, et al
as 16-35861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY R. ANDOE
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN KEMPH, Director, KEITH YORDY, Warden, MARK OLSON, Deputy Attorney General and others
Andoe v. Kemph et al
as 1:2016cv00287
Plaintiff:
Johnny R Andoe
Defendant:
Kevin Kemph, Keith Yordy, Mark Olson and others
Movant:
Douglas Raymond Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ritter v. Reinke et al
as 1:2013cv00509
Plaintiff:
James Daron Ritter
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Randy Blades, Eugene Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormack v. Everest National Insurance Company et al
as 1:2013cv00318
Defendant:
Everest National Insurance Company, Christopher E Caldwell, Ronda K Nichols and others
Plaintiff:
Robert James McCormack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathan Diggs v. Board of Corrections, et al
as 13-35017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN DANIEL DIGGS
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, ROBIN SANDY, CAROLING MELINIE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
