Labor Cases filed in Connecticut
Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Yu et al v. Wan Da Asian Cuisine LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00839
Plaintiff: Junjie Yu and Danny Siu
Defendant: Wan Da Asian Cuisine LLC, Fei Huang, Xiongjie Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pau v. Chen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00841
Plaintiff: Fuk Ling Pau
Defendant: Jian Le Chen, New China King LLC, Fang Rong Zheng and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lin v. Jasmine Szechuan Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01765
Plaintiff: Xiaoming Lin
Defendant: Jasmine Szechuan Inc., Empire Szechuan, Inc., Robert Siew and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Doe v. Sotil Tree Service, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv01184
Defendant: Richard Sotil and Sotil Tree Service
Plaintiff: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hariyanto v. Wild Rice Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00244
Defendant: Wild Rice Inc. , Guo Xiang Zhang , Chun Ping Kwok and others
Plaintiff: Fnu Hariyanto , Wira Lee , Yuan Zhoo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Caswell v. Terex Corp et al
as 3:2010cv00274
Plaintiff: Mark Caswell
Defendant: Terex Corp, Ronald M. DeFeo, G. Chris Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hollander v. Terex Corp et al
as 3:2010cv00195
Plaintiff: Scott Hollander
Defendant: Terex Corp, Terex Corp, Ronald DeFeo and others
Movant: Kenneth M. Lipman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Delgado et al v Le Figaro Bistro De Paris et al
as 3:2010cv00025
Plaintiff: Felix Delgado and Mario Estuardo Pena
Defendant: Le Figaro Bistro De Paris doing business as Le Figaro Bistro De Paris, Toscana Ristorante, Paul Ardaji, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Lipman v. Terex Corp et al
as 3:2010cv00006
Plaintiff: Kenneth M, Lipman
Defendant: Terex Corp, Admin Committee of the Terex Corp & Affiliates' 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan, Phillip C. Widman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Rade et al v. Pitney Bowes Inc et al
as 3:2009cv02023
Plaintiff: Henry M. Rade, Henry M. Rade and Nancy MacDougall
Defendant: Pitney Bowes Inc, Bruce P. Nolop, Michael J. Critelli and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?