Other Statutes Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 415
Marne Mitskog v. DOJ, et al
as 23-5121
Plaintiff / Appellant: Marne K. Mitskog
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Justice, Jennie L. Kneedler, Stephen J. Buckingham and others
John Doe v. SEC
as 23-1124
Petitioner: John Doe, (Claimant #1)
Respondent: Securities and Exchange Commission
John Doe v. SEC
as 23-1121
Petitioner: John Doe, (Claimant #1)
Respondent: Securities and Exchange Commission
SHARMIN v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv01015
Plaintiff: SAJIA SHARMIN
Defendant: ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, HELEN LAFAVE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
MASHHOUR et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv00877
Plaintiff: ABDUL KHALEK MASHHOUR and NELLY NAHHAS
Defendant: ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, HENRY T. WOOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
DALAL v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv00791
Plaintiff: REETA DALAL
Defendant: ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, MIKE HANKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
BANKS et al v. US BANK TRUST ASSOCIATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00767
Plaintiff: IRA R. BANKS and VERNA BANKS
Defendant: US BANK TRUST ASSOCIATION, BEATRICE GARRETT, BEST CARE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
John Doe v. SEC
as 23-1062
Petitioner: John Doe
Respondent: Securities and Exchange Commission
SHAH v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv00573
Plaintiff: ARNAV TUSHAR SHAH
Defendant: ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, ELIZABETH JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
KANSARA et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv00570
Plaintiff: ASHISH BHASKARBHAI KANSARA, VAIBHAVI ASHISH KANSARA, MANAV ASHISH KANSARA and others
Defendant: ANTONY BLINKEN, MIKE HANKEY, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?