Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Birmingham et al v. Rofx.net et al
as 1:2021cv23472
Counter Defendant:
Ryan Birmingham, Roman Leonov, Mitchell Parent and others
Defendant:
ROFX.NET, AURO ADVANTAGES LLC, AWARE CHOICE LTD. and others
Counter Claimant:
STANISLAV KHOMENKO
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jason Jensen v. Baycare Behavioral Health, Inc, et al
as 21-11734
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT RIVKEES, JANE DOE #1, JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON ADAM JENSEN
William Mann v. Henry Joseph, et al
as 19-13110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM MANN
Defendant / Appellee:
CLAYTON COUNTY, GA., MICHAEL WATTS, Individually and in Official Capacity as Clayton County Police Officer, HENRY ADRIAN JOSEPH, Individually and in Official Capacity as Clayton County Police Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al
as 0:2016cv60414
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Kim Scott, Thomas Joyce and others
Plaintiff:
Seminole Tribe of Florida and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv01622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
C.T. et al v. John Does 1 - 3
as 0:2014cv61283
Plaintiff:
C.T , L.T. and B.T.
Defendant:
John Does 1 - 3
Cause Of Action: Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
