Cases 1 - 7 of 7
LENNAN v. HARD ROCK HOTEL & CASINO ATLANTIC CITY et al
as 1:2022cv02804
Plaintiff:
Michael Lennan
Defendant:
HARD ROCK HOTEL & CASINO ATLANTIC CITY, BOARDWALK 1000 LLC, JOHN DOE OWNERS & LESSORS (1-5) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DIGNAN v. KOHL'S INC. et al
as 3:2021cv14564
Plaintiff:
Ida Dignan
Defendant:
KOHL'S INC., KOHL, JOHN DOE OWNERS AND LESSORS (1-5) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
POLINY-FUSCO v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. (AMTRAK) et al
as 2:2021cv12101
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. (AMTRAK), JOHN DOE OWNERS AND LESSORS 1-5, JOHN DOE MAINTENANCE COMPANIES 6-10 and others
Plaintiff:
JILL POLINY-FUSCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WALSH v. JERSEY SHORE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 3:2018cv11417
Defendant:
JERSEY SHORE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, JOHN DOE OWNERS & LESSORS (1-5), JOHN DOE EMPLOYEES (11-15) and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE WALSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOULD v. EUROPA SOUTH RESTAURANT et al
as 3:2016cv09061
Plaintiff:
JANE GOULD
Defendant:
EUROPA SOUTH RESTAURANT, JOHN DOE OWNERS AND LESSORS (#1 - #5), JOHN DOE MAINTENANCE COMPANIES (#6 - #10) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MULLANAPHY v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 3:2014cv02171
Plaintiff:
CECILIA MULLANAPHY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN DOE OWNERS AND LESSORS (#1 - #5) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
CALTABILOTA et al v. ARAMARK et al
as 3:2013cv01802
Plaintiff:
JOANNE CALTABILOTA and FRANK CALTABILOTA
Defendant:
ARAMARK , 200 LAUREL AVENUE C/O AT&T LEASE ADMINISTRATION, JOHN DOE OWNERS AND LESSORS (1-5) and others
Cross_claimant:
ARAMARK
Cross_defendant:
200 LAUREL AVENUE C/O AT&T LEASE ADMINISTRATION, JOHN DOE MAINTENANCE COMPANIES (6-10), JOHN DOE OWNERS AND LESSORS (1-5) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
