Cases 31 - 40 of 153
Marcos Ortiz, Jr. v. John Marshall
as 11-55643
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCOS ORTIZ, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN MARSHALL, Warden
Ester Burnett v. Bruce Faecher, et al
as 11-55637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTER BURNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE FAECHER, Doctor, J. STECK, Correctional Sergeant, SHORTER, Correctional Officer and others
Movant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
Alan Abraham v. John Marshall
as 11-55641
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALAN ABRAHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN MARSHALL, Warden
William Trudell v. John Marshall
as 11-55616
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM GEORGE TRUDELL
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN MARSHALL, Warden (CMC)
Robert Hollis v. John Marshall
as 11-55498
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT D. HOLLIS
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN MARSHALL, Warden
Edwin Derensbourg v. John Marshall
as 11-55467
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWIN DERENSBOURG, AKA Edwin Dernsbourg
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN MARSHALL, Warden
Hubert Petrich v. John Marshall
as 11-55308
Petitioner - Appellant:
HUBERT PETRICH
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN MARSHALL, Warden
David Harrison v. John Marshall
as 11-55257
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID SCOTT HARRISON
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN MARSHALL, Warden
Theodore Wilson v. Arnold Schwarzeneggar, et al
as 11-55183
Petitioner - Appellant:
THEODORE O'DELL WILSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGAR, Governor, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Theodore Wilson v. Arnold Schwarzeneggar, et al
as 11-55174
Petitioner - Appellant:
THEODORE O'DELL WILSON, and on behalf of those similarly situated
Respondent - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGAR, Governor, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
