Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Luyando v. Pay-O-Matic Check Cashing Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv03571
Intervenor:
David Buchanan, Eva Figueroa and Javon Jones
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-100, Pay-O-Matic Check Cashing Corp. and The Pay-O-Matic Corp
Plaintiff:
Carmen Luyando
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Luyando v. Pay-O-Matic Check Cashing Corp. et al
as 2:2019cv03578
Intervenor:
David Buchanan, Eva Figueroa and Javon Jones
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-100, Pay-O-Matic Check Cashing Corp. and The Pay-O-Matic Corp
Plaintiff:
Carmen Luyando
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Luyando v. Pay-O-Matic Check Cashing Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv11114
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-100, The Pay-O-Matic Corp and Pay-O-Matic Check Cashing Corp.
Plaintiff:
Carmen Luyando
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PARRINO v. SCHLAM et al
as 3:2015cv07674
Plaintiff:
GINA PARRINO
Defendant:
ELLIOT SCHLAM, NEW VISUAL MEDIA GROUP, LLC, JOHN AND JANE DOES (1-100) and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Camacho et al v. BTC Events, Inc. et al
as 7:2015cv02253
Plaintiff:
Jose Camacho , Pedro Contreras , Joseph Russo, Jr. and others
Defendant:
BTC Events, Inc., Leisure Time Tours of New York Corp., Mary Marsico and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Coastal Medical Group LLC et al v. Bombardiere et al
as 0:2014cv60113
Plaintiff:
Coastal Medical Group LLC and Medical Supply Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Joseph Bombardiere , Gabriel J. Domenech , Elizabeth Domenech and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
PRO CARE INC. et al v. SMITH et al
as 2:2013cv03506
Plaintiff:
PRO CARE INC.
Defendant:
THOMAS SMITH , GUARD WELL MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION, LLC , PAVAN PATEL and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
THOMAS SMITH
Counter_defendant:
THOMAS SMITH
Counter_claimant:
PRO CARE INC.
Thirdparty_defendant:
ANDRE OZERYANSKY, POLINA OZERYANSKY and STEVEN WEISSBLUM
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
