Cases 11 - 20 of 78
HENDERSON V. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv00555
Petitioner:
TAVARRES HENDERSON
Respondent:
JOE BIDEN and JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BEY v. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
BORGESS MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Petitioner:
ABDUL MALIK BEY
Respondent:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GARCIA v BIDEN et al.
as 1:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., BILL CLINTON, BETH GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00060
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03679
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
FANTEL v. BIDEN
as 1:2022cv02921
Petitioner:
JOHN FANTEL
Respondent:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AL BIHANI v. BIDEN et al.
as 1:2022cv02845
Petitioner:
TOFIQ NASSER AWAD AL BIHANI
Respondent:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, ANTHONY BLINKEN and others
Not Classified By Court:
LANCE A. OKAMURA and STEVEN D. YAMASHITA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
