Cases 1 - 8 of 8
STRICKLAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv26394
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH STRICKLAND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STRICKLAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00076
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH STRICKLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIVINE et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03135
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK RUFO, NATHANIEL RENTZ, DAVID CUNNINGHAM and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STRICKLAND v. ENGLISH
as 5:2015cv00167
Petitioner:
JOSEPH STRICKLAND
Respondent:
N C ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STRICKLAND v. ENGLISH
as 5:2014cv00325
Petitioner:
JOSEPH STRICKLAND
Respondent:
N C ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STRICKLAND v. ENGLISH
as 5:2014cv00134
Petitioner:
JOSEPH STRICKLAND
Respondent:
N C ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STRICKLAND v. ENGLISH et al
as 5:2013cv00248
Petitioner:
JOSEPH STRICKLAND
Respondent:
N C ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STRICKLAND v. ENGLISH
as 5:2013cv00101
Petitioner:
JOSEPH STRICKLAND
Respondent:
N C ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
