Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gomez v. JP Morgan Chase N.A.
as 8:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Gomez
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Conover et al v. JP Morgan Chase, N.A.
as 6:2023cv02427
Plaintiff:
John Scott Conover, Tina Conover, Samantha Conover and others
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase, John Jr Conover and JP Morgan Chase, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA)
Sellers v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
as 8:2016cv02085
Plaintiff:
James Sellers
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: Real Estate Settlement Procedure (RESPA) Act
Herman v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
as 8:2016cv02037
Plaintiff:
Eugene Herman
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Mediator:
Robert Michael Daisley
Cause Of Action: Real Estate Settlement Procedure (RESPA) Act
Blum v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 9:2015cv80466
Plaintiff:
Bruce S. Blum
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase and Co , Chase Mortage Customer Care, Aurora Commercial Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DeSouza v. JP Morgan Chase Home Lending Division et al
as 1:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie DeSouza
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Home Lending Division and McCurdy Candler, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jamie Birdette v. FirstSource Advantage, LLC, et al
as 12-10531
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMIE BIRDETTE
Defendant - Appellee:
FIRSTSOURCE ADVANTAGE, LLC, a.k.a. Firstcource Advantage, LLC and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA
Birdette v. Firstsource Advantage, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv04130
Plaintiff:
Jamie A. Birdette
Defendant:
FirstSource Advantage, LLC and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ACP Master, Ltd. et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2010cv20236
Plaintiff:
ACP Master, Ltd. and Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd.
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0632
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
