Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Munday v. Bank of America, NA et al
as 2:2017cv01216
Plaintiff:
Berta Munday
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA , Citi, GMAC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Munday v. Bank of America, NA et al
as 1:2017at00454
Plaintiff:
Berta Munday
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA, Citi, GMAC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horwitz v. Dimon et al
as 2:2014cv01489
Plaintiff:
Mayer Horwitz
Defendant:
James Dimon, James Bell, Crandall C. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horwitz v. Dimon et al
as 2:2014at00797
Plaintiff:
Mayer Horwitz
Defendant:
James Dimon, James Bell, Crandall C. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Miller v. Bell et al
as 2:2014cv00227
Plaintiff:
Bradley P Miller
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., James Bell , Crandall C. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Bell et al
as 2:2014at00100
Plaintiff:
Bradley P Miller
Unknown:
JPmorgan Chase Co.
Defendant:
James Bell, Crandall C. Bowles, Stephen B. Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ratcliff v. Dimon et al
as 2:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
Richard Ratcliff
Defendant:
Jamie Dimon, James A. Bell , Crandall C Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Dimon et al
as 2:2013cv02414
Plaintiff:
Ronald A. Harris
Defendant:
James Dimon, James Bell, Crandall C Bowles and others
Movant:
Jeffrey Shlosberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
County of Sacramento v. Bank of America Corporation, et al.
as 2:2013cv01476
Plaintiff:
County of Sacramento
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
