Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00618
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009mc00116
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Type:
Bankruptcy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009mc00117
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Type:
Bankruptcy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00615
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009mc00118
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Type:
Bankruptcy
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. v. LML Payment Systems Corp. et al
as 1:2009cv00283
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Defendant:
LML Payment Systems Corp. and Beanstream Internet Commerce Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al v. Affiliated Computer Services Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00189
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Electronic Financial Services Inc.
Defendant:
Affiliated Computer Services Inc. and ACS State & Local Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
