Cases 101 - 110 of 371
Jong Choul Kim v. JP Morgan Chase National Corporate Services Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09381
Defendant:
All Persons Unknown, DOES, JPMorgan Chase Bank , N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Jong Choul Kim
Laura E. Meza v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2015cv09416
Defendant:
Does, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and MTC Financial Inc.
Plaintiff:
Laura E. Meza
Novart Kasbarian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2015cv09073
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, LLC, Does, JPMorgan Chase Bank , N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Novart Kasbarian
Bernice Hardy et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank National Association et al
as 2:2015cv08624
Plaintiff:
Bernice P. Hardy Revocable Living Trust and Bernice Hardy
Defendant:
Caliber Home Loans, Does and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Parvin Jamali v. J.P. Morgan Chase Co. et al
as 2:2015cv08470
Defendant:
Does, J.P. Morgan Chase Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Parvin Jamali
Marco T. Navas et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2015cv08111
Defendant:
Does, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Quality Loan Service Corporation
Plaintiff:
Flor de Maria Navas and Marco T Navas
Commercial Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. DCON Design Plus Construction Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv07792
Plaintiff:
Commercial Sheet Metal Works, Inc.
Defendant:
DCON Design Plus Construction Inc., Does, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Linda Brice v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2015cv07762
Plaintiff:
Linda D. Brice
Defendant:
Does, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.
John M. Woodward, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, et al
as 2:2015cv07747
Defendant:
Does, JP Morgan Chase, JPMorgan Chase Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Joanne S. Woodward and John M Woodward
Scott Spande v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 5:2015cv01968
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association, JPMorgan Chase Bank NA and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc
Plaintiff:
Scott Spande
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
