Cases 31 - 40 of 120
Kurt Marin, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, et al
as 14-15223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KURT MARIN, MAURICE SYMONETTE, JAMES LITTLEJOHN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, WASHINGTON MUTUAL SECURITIES and WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA
Kristin Cantrell v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
as 14-14806
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KRISTIN CANTRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA
Davis v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2014cv02270
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline K. Davis
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
U.S. Bank National Association v. Tina Sanders, et al
as 14-12593
Plaintiff - Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellant:
TINA M. SANDERS, and All Other Residents
Defendant - Appellee:
MCCALLA RAYMER, LLC, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HEDGEROW COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Eric Dudley v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
as 14-12535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC DUDLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA
McIntyre v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
as 1:2014cv01749
Plaintiff:
Randy McIntyre
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shibley v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2014cv01728
Plaintiff:
Brian Shibley
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Ronnie DeWeese v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, et al
as 14-11970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE P. DEWEESE
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA, STATE FARM BANK, FSB and JOHN DOE 1-5
JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA v. Peterson et al
as 9:2014cv80503
Defendant:
David E. Peterson and Annie M. Peterson
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. National Consumer Services Corp. LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00936
Plaintiff:
Sean Davis
Defendant:
National Consumer Services Corp. LLC, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
