Contract Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Allstate Insurance Company v. Ruth et al
as 1:2012cv00258
Plaintiff: Allstate Insurance Company
Defendant: City of Ashland, Oregon, Jackson County, Oregon, Dylan Minor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Type: Contract Insurance
Baldenegro v. Naylor et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv03038
Defendant: Dan Childress, Dan Converse, Joe Ferguson and others
Plaintiff: Jose David Valdez Baldenegro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Contract Insurance
Citizens for Constitutional Fa, et al v. Jackson County, et al
as 10-36029
Plaintiff - Appellant: CITIZENS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FAIRNESS, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, PACIFIC WESTERN OF MEDFORD, L.L.C., DUANE CROSS and others
Plaintiff: VELDA DICKEY
Defendant - Appellee: JACKSON COUNTY, a political Subdivision of the State of Oregon and DANNY JORDAN
Citizens for Constitutional Fa, et al v. Rogue Advocates, et al
as 09-35669
Plaintiff - Appellee: CITIZENS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FAIRNESS, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, PACIFIC WESTERN OF MEDFORD, L.L.C., DUANE CROSS and others
Defendant: JACKSON COUNTY, a political Subdivision of the State of Oregon and DANNY JORDAN
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant: ROGUE ADVOCATES, FRIENDS OF MARION COUNTY, FRIENDS OF POLK COUNTY and others
Third-party-defendant - Appellee: STATE OF OREGON
Citizens for Constitutional Fa, et al v. Jackson County, et al
as 09-35653
Plaintiff / Appellee: CITIZENS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FAIRNESS, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, PACIFIC WESTERN OF MEDFORD, L.L.C., DUANE CROSS and others
Defendant / Appellant: JACKSON COUNTY, a political Subdivision of the State of Oregon
Defendant: DANNY JORDAN
Not Yet Classified: ROGUE ADVOCATES, FRIENDS OF MARION COUNTY, FRIENDS OF POLK COUNTY and others
3Rd Party Defendant: STATE OF OREGON
Amicus Curiae: PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION
Citizens for Constitutional Fa, et al v. Jackson County, et al
as 09-35653
Plaintiff - Appellee: CITIZENS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FAIRNESS, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, PACIFIC WESTERN OF MEDFORD, L.L.C., DUANE CROSS and others
Defendant - Appellant: JACKSON COUNTY, a political Subdivision of the State of Oregon
Defendant: DANNY JORDAN
Defendant-intervenor: ROGUE ADVOCATES, FRIENDS OF MARION COUNTY, FRIENDS OF POLK COUNTY and others
Third-party-defendant - Appellee: STATE OF OREGON
Amicus Curiae: ROGUE ADVOCATES, FRIENDS OF MARION COUNTY, FRIENDS OF POLK COUNTY and others
Cross, et al v. Jackson County, et al
as 08-36069
Plaintiff: CITIZENS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FAIRNESS, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, PACIFIC WESTERN OF MEDFORD, L.L.C., CARL OFFENBACHER and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: DUANE CROSS, BUD KAUFMAN, GARY WIRTH and others
Defendant - Appellee: JACKSON COUNTY, a political Subdivision of the State of Oregon and DANNY JORDAN
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee: ROGUE ADVOCATES, FRIENDS OF MARION COUNTY, FRIENDS OF POLK COUNTY and others
Third-party-defendant: STATE OF OREGON
Citizens for Constitutional Fa, et al v. Jackson County, et al
as 08-36058
Plaintiff - Appellee: CITIZENS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FAIRNESS, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, PACIFIC WESTERN OF MEDFORD, L.L.C., DUANE CROSS and others
Defendant - Appellant: JACKSON COUNTY, a political Subdivision of the State of Oregon
Defendant: DANNY JORDAN
Defendant-intervenor: ROGUE ADVOCATES, FRIENDS OF MARION COUNTY, FRIENDS OF POLK COUNTY and others
Third-party-defendant: STATE OF OREGON
Citizens for Constitutional Fa, et al v. Rogue Advocates, et al
as 08-36033
Plaintiff - Appellee: CITIZENS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FAIRNESS, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, PACIFIC WESTERN OF MEDFORD, L.L.C., DUANE CROSS and others
Defendant: JACKSON COUNTY, a political Subdivision of the State of Oregon and DANNY JORDAN
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant: ROGUE ADVOCATES, FRIENDS OF MARION COUNTY, FRIENDS OF POLK COUNTY and others
Third-party-defendant: STATE OF OREGON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?