Cases 21 - 30 of 54
JACKSON HEWITT INC. v. LABIB BALTAGI CPA, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00808
Plaintiff:
JACKSON HEWITT INC.
Defendant:
LABIB BALTAGI CPA, INC., LABIB BALTAGI and LUCILLE BALTAGI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Calderaro v. Jackson Hewitt Inc.
as 2:2013cv00701
Plaintiff:
Jamal Calderaro
Defendant:
JACKSON HEWITT INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
JACKSON HEWITT, INC. v. DIVERSITY TAX SERVICES et al
as 2:2013cv00600
Plaintiff:
JACKSON HEWITT, INC.
Defendant:
DIVERSITY TAX SERVICES , HUSSAM M. KHATIB and CONNIE C. KHATIB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
JACKSON HEWITT INC. v. GLEASON
as 2:2013cv00510
Plaintiff:
JACKSON HEWITT INC.
Defendant:
CHRISTINE E. GLEASON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
JACKSON HEWITT INC. v. LUKE
as 2:2013cv00512
Plaintiff:
JACKSON HEWITT INC.
Defendant:
TERRY LUKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
JACKSON HEWITT INC. v. COTCAV, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00513
Plaintiff:
JACKSON HEWITT INC.
Defendant:
COTCAV, INC. and DAVID W. CAVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
JACKSON HEWITT INC. v. CONUNDRUM, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00400
Plaintiff:
JACKSON HEWITT INC.
Defendant:
CONUNDRUM, INC. and CHARLIE THOMAS PARISH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
JACKSON HEWITT INC. v. MAXES, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00408
Plaintiff:
JACKSON HEWITT INC.
Defendant:
MAXES, LLC and MARK RUSSO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
JACKSON HEWITT INC. v. SMITH
as 2:2013cv00409
Plaintiff:
JACKSON HEWITT INC.
Defendant:
EDMUND SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
JACKSON HEWITT INC. v. LARSON & SAVAGE, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00403
Plaintiff:
JACKSON HEWITT INC.
Defendant:
LARSON & SAVAGE, INC., RAYMOND MEDEIROS and CHUNGFU ERIK HSIEH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
