Cases 1 - 10 of 11
COOPER JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv25642
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES W COOPER JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv37669
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv24520
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES DEREK COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cooper v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv02215
Plaintiff:
JAMES A COOPER
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradley v. Duckwilner et al
as 3:2018cv00134
Plaintiff:
James Cliftion Bradley
Defendant:
Mr. Duckwilner, Mr. Ware, Mr. N. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00891
Petitioner:
James Lee Cooper
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cooper v. Nelnet, Inc.
as 6:2014cv00314
Plaintiff:
James David Cooper, Jr.
Defendant:
Nelnet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Cooper v. Secretary Department of Corrections
as 8:2012cv01947
Petitioner:
James Richard Cooper
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
QA3 Financial Corp. v. Catlin Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 1:2010cv23452
Plaintiff:
QA3 Financial Corp.
Defendant:
Catlin Specialty Insurance Company, Nohemy Sokolsky, Arthur Cargill and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0635
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. COOPER
as 1:2010mc00050
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMES R COOPER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
