Cases 1 - 10 of 21
MILLER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv42003
Plaintiff:
JAMES K. MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv39006
Plaintiff:
JAMES O. MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv39005
Plaintiff:
JAMES R MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv31811
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv30525
Plaintiff:
JAMES W. MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY and FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51822
Plaintiff:
JAMES S MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SKF USA INC. v. MILLER
as 2:2010cv04625
Plaintiff:
SKF USA INC.
Defendant:
JAMES W. MILLER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
MILLER v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv79768
Plaintiff:
JAMES PETER MILLER, SR.
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AARSETH v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33234
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. MILLER and JAMES R. MILLER
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MILLER v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv92543
Plaintiff:
JAMES PATMAN MILLER
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., A C & S, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
