Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
USA v. James Batmasian
as 21-12800
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES BATMASIAN
Patricia Gonzalez v. James Batmasian, et al
as 18-11443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES BATMASIAN, individually d.b.a. Investments Limited and MARTA BATMASIAN, individually d.b.a. Investments Limited
Patricia Gonzalez v. James Batmasian, et al
as 17-13760
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES BATMASIAN and MARTA BATMASIAN
Patricia Gonzalez, et al v. James Batmasian, et al
as 17-13740
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross Appellant:
PATRICIA GONZALEZ
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LESHA ROSARIO
Defendant - Appellant-Cross Appellee:
JAMES BATMASIAN, individually, d.b.a. Investments Limited and MARTA BATMASIAN, individually, d.b.a. Investments Limited
James Baker v. James Batmasian, et al
as 17-12830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES BATMASIAN, d.b.a. Investments Limited and MARTA BATMASIAN, d.b.a. Investments Limited
Patricia Gonzalez, et al v. James Batmasian, et al
as 17-12751
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA GONZALEZ and LESHA ROSARIO
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES BATMASIAN and MARTA BATMASIAN
Baker v. Batmasian et al
as 9:2016cv81928
Plaintiff:
James Baker
Defendant:
James Batmasian and Marta Batmasian
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Molnoski v. Batmasian et al
as 9:2016cv81789
Plaintiff:
Michael Molnoski
Defendant:
James Batmasian and Marta Batmasian
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
