Cases 1 - 10 of 16
James Tyson, Sr. v. Congressional District D.C.
as 21-3805
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Congressional District of Washington D.C.
James Tyson, Sr. v. Biden Administration, et al
as 21-3474
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Biden Administration and Internal Revenue Service
James Tyson, Sr. v. Anamosa State Penitentiary, et al
as 21-3402
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Anamosa State Penitentiary, Classification Committee and Warden of Treatment
James Tyson, Sr. v. Tracy Dietsch
as 21-3125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Tracy Dietsch, Warden of Treatment, Anamosa State Penitentiary
James Tyson, Sr. v. Jeremy Larson, et al
as 21-2872
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Jeremy Larson, Warden, Anamosa State Penitentiary, Thomas Miller and Jeffrey S. Thompson
James Tyson, Sr. v. Casey Orwig, et al
as 21-2761
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Casey Orwig, Activities Specialist, Anamosa State Penitentiary and Scott Esheon, Deputy Warden, Anamosa State Penitentiary
James Tyson, Sr. v. Gail Sheridan-Lucht
as 21-2762
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Gail Sheridan-Lucht, Administrative Law Judge, Iowa Department of Corrections
James Tyson, Sr. v. Anamosa State Prison Business, et al
as 21-1683
Defendant / Appellee:
Lisa, Marie, Anamosa State Prison Business Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
James Tyson, Sr. v. Robert Johnson
as 21-1538
Respondent / Appellee:
Robert Johnson, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
James Tyson, Sr. v. Kimberly Reynolds
as 21-1381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Kimberly Reynolds
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
