Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ignacio Martinez v. James D. Hartley
as 5:2008cv00835
Respondent:
James D. Hartley
Petitioner:
Ignacio Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Taylor v. E. Roe, et al
as 2:1997cv04856
Respondent:
Attorney General State of California, Acting Warden James D. Hartley, Mendoza-Powers and others
Petitioner:
Anthony NMI Taylor
Unknown:
Monica Knox and Maria E Stratton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willie Ray Bush v. James D. Hartley
as 2:2010cv01118
Plaintiff:
Willie Ray Bush
Defendant:
James D. Hartley
West v. Hartley
as 2:2009cv00260
Petitioner:
Darryl F. West
Respondent:
James D. Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richard Terry Larson v. James D. Hartley
as 5:2009cv01959
Petitioner:
Richard Terry Larson
Respondent:
James D Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harry Eugene Jones v. James D. Hartley
as 2:2009cv06785
Petitioner:
Harry Eugene Jones
Respondent:
James D. Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Anthony Garcia v. James D Hartley
as 5:2009cv01615
Petitioner:
John Anthony Garcia
Respondent:
James D Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gregory Alvarez Deville v. James D. Hartley
as 5:2008cv01301
:
Respondent:
James D. Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alden Alexander Thomas, Sr. v. James D. Hartley
as 2:2008cv05600
Respondent:
James D. Hartley and Warden John F Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lonnie Lee Manuel v. James D. Hartley
as 2:2009cv00812
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Manuel
Defendant:
James D. Hartley, T. Salgado, J. Handorf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
