Cases 1 - 6 of 6
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Easements and Rights-of-Way Over a Total of 11.21 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Tipton County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2011cv02869
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
Easements and Rights-of-Way Over a Total of 11.21 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Tipton County, Tennessee, James I. Burlison, Ann D. Burlison and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-of-Way over 4.21 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Tipton County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2011cv02867
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way over 4.21 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Tipton County, Tennessee, James I. Burlison and Ann D. Burlison
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258
James Burlison, et al v. USA
as 11-5588
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES I. BURLISON, RODNEY L. WAITS and BUFORD O'NEAL TANKERSLEY
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Burlison et al v. United States of America
as 2:2007cv02439
Plaintiff:
James I. Burlison, Rodney L. Waits and Buford O'Neal Tankersley
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Burlison et al v. United States of America
as 2:2007cv02151
Plaintiff:
James I. Burlison, Rodney L. Waits and Buford O'Neal Tankersley
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Burlison, et al v. USA
as 06-6369
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES I. BURLISON, RODNEY L. WAITS and BUFORD O'NEAL TANKERSLEY
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
