Cases 1 - 10 of 100
RAMSEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13136
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE RAMSEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VANDERZYL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11341
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE VANDERZYL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CATAZARO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10417
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE CATAZARO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2023cv00643
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PETERSON JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01704
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE PETERSON JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv16909
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAMES LEE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BALLARD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2023cv00161
Petitioner:
JAMES LEE BALLARD
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12029
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LEE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10247
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BALLARD v. BROLING et al
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE BALLARD
Defendant:
JOHN LYON BROLING, BRIAN C RODGERS and EDGAR JONES III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.