Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Croswell v. Kempton et al
as 2:2023cv02734
Defendant:
Courtney O Platt, James Matthew Kempton and Courtney E Osullivan
Plaintiff:
Herschel Croswell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
MATTHEWS v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv57296
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTHEWS
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MATTHEWS et al v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv32913
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTHEWS and WILLARD E. BARTEL
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MATTHEWS v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv32914
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTHEWS
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MATTHEWS v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33088
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTHEWS and JAMES MATTHEWS
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MATTHEWS v. I-FLOW CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv04486
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTHEWS
Defendant:
I-FLOW CORPORATION, STRYKER CORPORATION, STRYKER SALES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MATTHEWS et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv84788
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTHEWS and JAMES MATTHEWS
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION, CONGOLEUM CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JORDAN v. FIBREBOARD CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv74286
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTHEW JORDAN
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORP., PITTSBURGH CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., JOHN CRANE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CALDWELL v. AQUA-CHEM, INC et al
as 2:2007cv60072
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTHEW CALDWELL
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC, BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
