Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Jones v. Walsh
as 1:2006cv00225
Petitioner: James Jones
Respondent: James Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Walsh
as 1:2008cv01168
Petitioner: William John Nelson
Respondent: James Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hodge v. Walsh
as 1:2007cv07588
Petitioner: Martin Hodge
Respondent: James Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fryar v. Walsh
as 7:2007cv06683
Plaintiff: Gerald L. Fryar
Defendant: James Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neil v. Walsh We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv06685
Petitioner: Vernon Neil
Respondent: James Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fryar v. Walsh We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv06683
Plaintiff: Gerald L. Fryar
Defendant: James Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gant v. Walsh We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv02427
Petitioner: Stanley Gant
Respondent: James Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walsh v. Goord et al
as 1:2007cv00246
Plaintiff: Michael Walsh
Defendant: Glen S. Goord, John R. Patterson, Lucien LeClaire, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Walsh We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01198
Petitioner: Cleon Watson
Respondent: James Walsh and James Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Madden v. Walsh
as 1:2007cv00489
Petitioner: Edwin Madden
Respondent: James Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?