Cases 61 - 70 of 82
WILLIAMS et al v. CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv90623
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS and ANNIE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, GARLOCK INC, GARLOCK INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WILLIAMS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv80922
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WILLIAMS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv80924
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WILLIAMS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv80923
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WILLIAMS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv80921
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WILLIAMS v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv79555
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC., GULF BELTING & GASKET CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
EDDINGTON v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv78167
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAM EDDINGTON
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BECKHAM, ET AL. v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv74061
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAM BECKHAM
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CALLAWAY v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv74217
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAM CALLAWAY
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BOWERS v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv74135
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAM BOWERS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
