Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Jan Domanus, et al v. Locke Lord LLP, et al
as 15-3647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAN DOMANUS, ANDREW KOZLOWSKI, both individually and derivatively on behalf of, KRAKOW BUSINESS PARK SP. ZO.O. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LOCKE LORD LLP, DANIEL I. SCHLESSINGER, MARTIN W. JASZCZUK and others
Jan Domanus, et al v. Locke Lord LLP, et al
as 15-3647
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAN DOMANUS, ANDREW KOZLOWSKI, both individually and derivatively on behalf of, KRAKOW BUSINESS PARK SP. ZO.O. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LOCKE LORD LLP, DANIEL I. SCHLESSINGER, MARTIN W. JASZCZUK and others
Jan Domanus, et al v. Derek Lewicki, et al
as 13-2435
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAN DOMANUS and ANDREW KOZLOWSKI, both individually and derivatively on behalf of
Defendant - Appellant:
DEREK LEWICKI, ADAM SWIECH and RICHARD SWIECH
Jan Domanus, et al v. Derek Lewicki, et al
as 12-2154
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAN DOMANUS and ANDREW KOZLOWSKI, both individually and derivatively on behalf of
Defendant - Appellant:
DEREK LEWICKI, RICHARD SWIECH and ADAM SWIECH
Andrew Kozlowski, et al v. Krakow Business Park SP. ZO.O., et al
as 12-2135
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANDREW KOZLOWSKI, both individually and derivatively on behalf of and JAN DOMANUS
Defendant - Appellant:
KRAKOW BUSINESS PARK SP. ZO.O., KBP-1 SP. ZO.O., KBP-2 SP. ZO.O. and others
Defendant:
DEREK LEWICKI and RICHARD SWEICH
Jan Domanus, et al v. Derek Lewicki, et al
as 11-1841
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAN DOMANUS and ANDREW KOZLOWSKI, both individually and derivatively on behalf of
Defendant:
DEREK LEWICKI and RICHARD SWEICH
Defendant - Appellant:
KRAKOW BUSINESS PARK SP. ZO.O., KBP-1 SP. ZO.O., KBP-2 SP. ZO.O. and others
Domanus et al v. Lewicki et al
as 1:2008cv04922
Plaintiff:
Jan Domanus, Jan Domanus, Jan Domanus and others
Defendant:
Derek Lewicki, Richard Swiech, Adam Swiech and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
