Cases 1 - 7 of 7
A1 Quality Appliance, Inc. v. Folsom Lake Appliance, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00053
Defendant:
John or Jane Does 1-10, Michael Peters, XYZ Corporation 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
A1 Quality Appliance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Economical Insurance et al
as 9:2018cv00103
Plaintiff:
Melba Sue Johnson
Defendant:
Economical Insurance and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MacMillan v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00030
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward MacMillan
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and John & Jane Does, 1-99
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Langel et al v. Metrocities Mortgage, LLC et al
as 9:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
Tom Langel and DeeAnn Langel
Defendant:
Metrocities Mortgage, LLC, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. , Prospect Mortgage, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Langel et al v. Metrocities Mortgage, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00059
Plaintiff:
Tom Langel and DeeAnn Langel
Defendant:
Metrocities Mortgage, LLC, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. , Prospect Mortgage, LLC and others
Counter_claimant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. , Thornburg Mortgage Securities Trust Loan Pass-Through Certificate Series 2006-3 , US Bank, N.A. and others
Counter_defendant:
DeeAnn Langel and Tom Langel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Balance Point Divorce Funding v. Masters et al
as 2:2012cv00040
Plaintiff:
Balance Point Divorce Funding
Defendant:
Lila S. Masters , John Does 1-5 and Jane Does 1-5
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Lila S. Masters
Third_party_defendant:
Balance Point Divorce Funding
Counter_claimant:
Lila S. Masters
Counter_defendant:
John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
National Home Insurance Group v. Racine et al
as 4:2010cv00057
Defendant:
Newton Racine, Mary Racine, Allie Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
National Home Insurance Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
