Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DOE v. MISSIONARY OBLATES OF MARY IMMACULATE EASTERN PROVINCE
as 1:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
MISSIONARY OBLATES OF MARY IMMACULATE EASTERN PROVINCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
BEAL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv00550
Plaintiff:
GAYLE L BEAL
Defendant:
JANE DOES 1 - 30, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC, UNKNOWN BUSINESSES AND/OR CORPORATIONS 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHROTH et al v. MONKEY TRUNKS SACO LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00131
Defendant:
JANE DOE, MONKEY TRUNKS SACO LLC, TREE-MENDOUS FOREST INC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SCHROTH and KELLY SCHROTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DODGE et al v. WATERFRONT CONCERTS LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00274
Plaintiff:
JAYME DODGE and TODD DODGE
Defendant:
WATERFRONT CONCERTS LLC, ALEX GRAY, TIMOTHY GAGNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCGARR v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 1:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
DARLENE MCGARR
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP, PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOONAN v. YORK COUNTY et al
as 2:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
SHANE NOONAN
Defendant:
YORK COUNTY, MAURICE OUELLETTE, JAY BONDAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREENWOOD et al v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP et al
as 1:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
DONALD M GREENWOOD and MARCHETA B GREENWOOD
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHN DOE et al v. CARRABASSETT VALLEY ACADEMY
as 1:2012cv00273
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Defendant:
CARRABASSETT VALLEY ACADEMY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURTAGH, MD v. ST MARY'S REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER et al
as 2:2012cv00160
Plaintiff:
JAMES MURTAGH, MD
Defendant:
ST MARY'S REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER, ST MARY'S HEALTH SYSTEM, IRA SHAPIRO, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
