Cases 11 - 15 of 15
KENNEDY v. STRINGER et al
as 2:2014cv06936
Plaintiff:
MELVENE LYNN KENNEDY
Defendant:
C. VIVIAN STRINGER, DEFOREST BLAKE "BUSTER" SOARIES, JR. , FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF LINCOLN GARDENS, SOMERSET, NEW JERSEY and others
Cross_claimant:
CDC PROPERTIES , DEFOREST BLAKE "BUSTER" SOARIES, JR. , CENTRAL JERSEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and others
Cross_defendant:
PETER J HENDRICKS, ESQ. and C. VIVIAN STRINGER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
ADLER et al v. RODETSKY et al
as 2:2014cv03696
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN ADLER , JOHN DOES 1-10 , JANE DOES 1-10 and others
Defendant:
ALAN RODETSKY, DUQUAN BELL, KAREN O'NEIL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
MORRISTOWN TRANSMISSIONS, LLC et al v. 2 JOS, LLC, et al
as 2:2014cv02912
Plaintiff:
MORRISTOWN TRANSMISSIONS, LLC , PHILIP MATTHEWS , CHACKO MATTHEWS and others
Defendant:
2 JOS, LLC , NCFP, LLC , P.D. FIORENTINO, INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC. and AMERICAN DRIVELINE CENTERS, INC.
Cross_defendant:
NICHOLAS G. CIAELLA , PETER FIORENTINO , HACKENSACK AA, LLC and others
Counter_claimant:
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC. , AMERICAN DRIVELINE CENTERS, INC. , NICHOLAS G. CIAELLA and others
Counter_defendant:
PHILIP MATTHEWS and MORRISTOWN TRANSMISSIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CARRILLO et al v. 48TH STREET WEEHAWKEN LLC et al
as 2:2013cv06229
Plaintiff:
EUGENIO CARRILLO , BEATRIZ CARRILLO , DAVID DIFABIO and others
Defendant:
48TH STREET WEEHAWKEN LLC, ERNEST GARCIA, JR., ROBERT BARSA and others
Cross_claimant:
MARK GOULD and MARK GOULD ARCHITECT
Cross_defendant:
48TH STREET WEEHAWKEN LLC, AC CONSTRUCTION CORP., RICHARD BARSA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
LENTINI v. RUGGIERO et al
as 3:2012cv03586
Plaintiff:
JACQUELYN LENTINI
Defendant:
NICHOLAS RUGGIERO, ANTHONY CARPINELLO, FIVE STAR CAPITAL GROUP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
