Cases 1 - 8 of 8
United Food and Commercial Workers Union- Employer Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Catullo Prime Meats, Inc.
as 4:2020cv01710
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Employer Pension Fund, James Trout, Carl Ivka and others
Defendant:
Catullo Prime Meats, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
United Food and Commercial Workers Union - Employer Pension Fund v. Westside Sparkle Market, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv02866
Defendant:
ATM of Ohio, LLC, 1912 Mahoning Avenue LLC, Andrew J. Jarosz and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Ivka, Jean Colarik, United Food and Commercial Workers Union - Employer Pension Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
United Food & Commercial Workers Union-Employer Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Ellet Grocery Corporation
as 5:2017cv00556
Plaintiff:
United Food & Commercial Workers Union-Employer Health & Welfare Fund , United Food & Commercial Workers Union Employer Pension Fund , Carl Ivka and others
Defendant:
Ellet Grocery Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 880 - Retail Food Employers Joint Pension Fund et al v. Landmark Foods, Inc.
as 1:2010cv01051
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 880 - Retail Food Employers Pension Fund , United Food and Commercial Workers Union - Employer Health and Welfare Fund , Thomas H. Robertson and others
Defendant:
Landmark Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
United Food and Commercial Workers Local No. 880 et al v. Landmark Foods, Inc. d/b/a Church Square Supermarket
as 1:2009cv01058
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Local No. 880, United Food and Commercial Workers Local No. 880, United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 880 - Retail Food Employers Joint Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Landmark Foods, Inc. d/b/a Church Square Supermarket
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Local 880 United Food and Commercial Workers Union Retail Food Employers Pension Fund et al v. Landmark Foods, Inc.
as 1:2008cv02872
Plaintiff:
Local 880 United Food and Commerical Workers Union Retail Food Employers Pension Fund, Local 880 United Food and Commerical Workers Union Retail Food Employers Pension Fund, Local 880 United Food and Commerical Workers Union Retail Food Employers Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Landmark Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 880 - Retail Food Employers Pension Fund et al v. Forest Hills Supermarket, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00735
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 880 - Retail Food Employers Pension Fund, Thomas H. Robertson, Jean Colarik and others
Defendant:
Forest Hills Supermarket, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In Re: WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 1:2002cv03288
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Sam P. Seay, State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio, Jere L. Beasley and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Bank of America Securities LLC, Banc of America Securities LLC, Credit Suisse Group and others
Petitioner:
Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of operating Engineers-Employers Construction Retirement Trust, The National Asbestos Workers Pension Fund, State of Alaska Department of Revenue and others
Plaintiff:
Plumbers & Steamfitters Local 577 Pension Fund, Wayne L. Matthews, George T. Flyny and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Jack Grubman, Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets Limited
Claimant:
Paul G. Rochmis, UBS Financial Services Inc., Holly M. Haik and others
Appellant:
Terry Neal, Teresa O. Moxley, Retirement Systems of Alabama and others
Defendant:
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Worldcom, Inc., ABN Amro Incorporated and others
Lead Plaintiff:
New York State Common Retirement Fund, HGK Asset Management, H. Carl McCall and others
Respondent:
Roslyn Berger
Not Classified By Court:
Jane B. Selfe, James J. Savage, Cynthia R. Levin Moulton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
