Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Pedro Hernandez v. Jeanne Woodford
as 11-16530
Petitioner - Appellant:
PEDRO HERNANDEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
JEANNE WOODFORD, Director CDC
Michael Victory v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 11-16187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL VICTORY
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor, JEANNE WOODFORD, Director of Corrections, JAMES A. YATES, Warden and others
Richard Runquist v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 11-16101
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD G. RUNQUIST
Respondent - Appellee:
JEANNE WOODFORD, K. PROSPER, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Marlin Penn v. M. McDonald, et al
as 11-15884
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLIN ASHLEY PENN
Defendant - Appellee:
M. D. MCDONALD, Warden, KEATING, Sgt. and JEANNE WOODFORD, Director
George Strong v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 11-55406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE BERRY STRONG
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE WOODFORD, Director, in her individual capacity, MATTHEW MARTEL, Associate Warden, in his individual capacity, JOANN GORDON, Warden, in her individual capacity and others
Vincent Bruce v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 11-15195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT C. BRUCE
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE WOODFORD, DERRAL G. ADAMS, LYDIA HENSE and others
Dennis Hezekiah v. John Marshall, et al
as 11-55011
Petitioner - Appellant:
DENNIS MENELIK HEZEKIAH
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, California Men's Colony and JEANNE WOODFORD, Director, California Department of Corrections
Randy Williams v. Jeanne Woodford
as 11-55001
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDY WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
JEANNE WOODFORD, Dir of Corr
Randy Williams v. Jeanne Woodford
as 10-57068
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDY WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
JEANNE WOODFORD, Dir of Corr
Jesse Perez v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 10-17773
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE WOODFORD, P. L. WINETT, Chief Deputy Warden, M. K. WITCHER, Associate Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
