Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Bryan Lankford v. Jeff Zmuda
as 11-35475
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRYAN STUART LANKFORD
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFF ZMUDA
ATF Field Agent #91057 v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2011cv00131
Defendant:
State of Idaho and Jeff Zmuda
Plaintiff:
ATF Field Agent #91057
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lerajjareanra Kelly v. Michael Johnson, et al
as 10-35837
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LERAJJAREANRA O. KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL JOHNSON, A. DEWAYNE SHEDD, BRENT REINKE and others
Lerajjareanra-O-Kel-ly v. Johnson et al
as 1:2009cv00645
Plaintiff:
- Lerajjareanra-O-Kel-ly
Defendant:
Michael Johnson, A DeWayne Shedd, Jeff Eastman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrell v. Zmuda
as 1:2009cv00548
Petitioner:
Dean A Harrell
Respondent:
Jeff Zmuda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romero v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00542
Plaintiff:
Shane Elloyd Romero
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., April Dawson, Kathleen Niecko and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lankford v. Zmuda
as 1:2009cv00538
Petitioner:
Bryan Stuart Lankford
Respondent:
Jeff Zmuda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bleau v. Beauclair et al
as 1:2008cv00021
Plaintiff:
James Bleau
Defendant:
Tom Beauclair, Randy Blades, Jeff Kirkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orr et al v. Tibbs et al
as 1:2006cv00053
Plaintiff:
Patrick Edward Smrz and Roy Burstein
Defendant:
Tom BeauClair, Pam Sonnen, Pam Sonnen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hahaj v. IDOC et al
as 1:2007cv00201
Plaintiff:
Jim Mitchell Hahaj
Defendant:
IDOC, Jeff Zmuda, Dawn Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
