Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
PINSON v. ASH et al
as 1:2019cv00379
Defendant: ANGELA DUNBAR, BUREAU OF PRISONS, S. BASS and others
Plaintiff: JEREMY PINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUSTE v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2018cv01918
Petitioner: ANDRE JUSTE
Respondent: THOMAS J. FEELEY, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III and JEFFREY J. SEARLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MARSHALL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv01258
Plaintiff: MICHELLE RENEE MARSHALL
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, MARK S. INCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v. SESSIONS
as 1:2018cv00825
Petitioner: MARK COOPER
Respondent: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HALL v. SESSIONS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02467
Petitioner: CLYDE WILLIAMS HALL, JR.
Respondent: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SHEPHARD v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2017cv01694
Plaintiff: ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Defendant: DONALD J. TRUMP, MIKE PENCE, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARROCA v. SESSIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01570
Petitioner: ROBERT W. BARROCA
Respondent: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III and THOMAS KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MULDROW v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv01347
Plaintiff: LEALON (AMIR MUSA) MULDROW
Defendant: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, THOMAS KANE, IAN CONNERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
COBBLE v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv01196
Petitioner: DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III and DONALD J. TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STINE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv01127
Plaintiff: MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?