Cases 11 - 20 of 88
Diop v. Sessions et al
as 1:2018cv08245
Petitioner:
Seydou Diop
Respondent:
Assistant Director Scott Mechkowski, Attorney General Jefferson Sessions, Director Thomas Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04873
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04737
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mejia Lara v. Decker et al
as 1:2018cv07605
Respondent:
Field OfficeDirector Thomas Decker, Director Carl DuBois, Assistant Director Diane McConnell and others
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Mejia Lara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06527
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04026
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03912
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
McRae v. Sessions et al
as 6:2018cv06489
Respondent:
Jefferson Sessions, Warden of Immigration and Detention Facility, The Field Office Director of the Buffalo Field Office of ICE and others
Petitioner:
Troy McRae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
