Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jeffrey Katz Chiropractic, Inc. v. Lochness Medical Supplies Inc.
as 3:2021cv07096
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Katz Chiropractic, Inc.
Defendant:
Lochness Medical Supplies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Floyd et al v. Wenig Holdings LLC
as 3:2021cv05548
Plaintiff:
Louis Floyd and Jeffrey Katz
Defendant:
Wenig Holdings LLC doing business as INSURANCESERVICES4U.com
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Katz v. Openmed Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv05358
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Katz
Defendant:
Openmed Inc. and DOES 1 -10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Katz v. National Integrated Healthcare Group LLC
as 3:2021cv04379
Defendant:
National Integrated Healthcare Group LLC
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Katz
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Jeffrey Katz Chiropractic, Inc. v. Canadian Medical Dist., Inc.
as 3:2020cv08911
Defendant:
Canadian Medical Dist., Inc. doing business as Medykits.com
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Katz Chiropractic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Katz v. Safe Harbor Exchange, Inc.
as 3:2020cv07676
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Katz
Defendant:
Safe Harbor Exchange, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Katz v. MF Business Development et al
as 3:2020cv05858
Defendant:
Daniel Farris, MF Business Development and Donna Meeks
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Katz
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Jeffrey Katz Chiropratic, Inc. v. iBeat, Inc.
as 3:2020cv02097
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Katz Chiropratic, Inc.
Defendant:
iBeat, Inc., d/b/a 100Plus and IBeat, Inc. a Delaware Corporation doing business as 100PLUS
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Jeffrey Katz Chiropratic, Inc., v. Diamond Respiratory Care, Inc.
as 3:2020cv04108
Defendant:
Diamond Respiratory Care, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Katz Chiropratic, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Katz v. Allied Medical Technology, Inc.
as 3:2020cv04128
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Katz
Defendant:
Allied Medical Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
