Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Pough v. Gittere et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Jerry D. Pough
Respondent:
William Gittere and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pough v. Gittere et al
as 3:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
Jerry D. Pough
Respondent:
William Gittere and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pough v. Gittere
as 23-3478
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERRY D. POUGH
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM L. GITTERE
Pough v. Gittere
as 3:2023cv00425
Petitioner:
Jerry D. Pough
Respondent:
William Gittere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jerry Pough v. William Gittere, et al
as 20-17313
Respondent / Appellee:
ELY STATE PRISON, WILLIAM GITTERE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERRY D. POUGH, AKA Jerry Doran Pough, AKA Jerry Duron Pough
Jerry Pough v. Timothy Filson, et al
as 18-16444
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY D. POUGH, AKA Jerry Doran Pough, AKA Jerry Duron Pough
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY FILSON, ELY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Pough v. Filson et al
as 3:2018cv00191
Respondent:
Ely State Prison, Timothy Filson and Nevada Attorney General
Unknown:
Adam P. Laxalt, Adam P. Laxalt, Adam P. Laxalt and others
Petitioner:
Jerry D. Pough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jerry Pough v. D. Neven, et al
as 16-17034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY D. POUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
D. NEVEN, RENEE BAKER, Warden, DOUGLAS GILLESPIE and others
Pough v. Neven et al
as 3:2015cv00443
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Douglas Gillespie, Nevada Attorney General and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry D. Pough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerry Pough v. Doug Gillespie, et al
as 14-15412
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY D. POUGH
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUG GILLESPIE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
