Cases 1 - 10 of 18
SUN v. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv03632
Plaintiff:
XIU JIAN SUN
Defendant:
JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CHENG et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv02602
Plaintiff:
JIAN YI CHENG, XING CHEN, HOURASA SEIRAFITEHRANIAN and others
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
SUN v. OBAMA
as 1:2021cv01442
Plaintiff:
XIU JIAN SUN
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS et al v. TRUMP
as 1:2020cv03331
Plaintiff:
XIU JIAN SUN and CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS
Defendant:
DONALD JOHN TRUMP and DONALD J. TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 8715
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS et al v. CONTRERAS
as 1:2020cv00197
Plaintiff:
XIU JIAN SUN and CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS
Defendant:
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
