Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Michael McLaughlin v. Dwayne Deal, et al
as 21-15998
Defendant / Appellee:
MONIQUE HUBBARD-PICKET, CCS III, NANCY FLORES, JIM GIBBONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. MCLAUGHLIN
Michael McLaughlin v. Dwayne Deal, et al
as 20-15309
Defendant / Appellee:
MONIQUE HUBBARD-PICKET, CCS III, DWAYNE DEAL, OMD administrator, NETHANJAH CHILDERS and others
Defendant:
JIM GIBBONS, FRANK DREESEN, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. MCLAUGHLIN
Kevin Almy v. Minor Adams, et al
as 19-15158
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL J. THOMAS, RUBEN VIDAURRI, JIM GIBBONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN ALMY
Orr v. State of Nevada, ex rel et al
as 2:2018cv01558
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Jim Gibbons, Nevada Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Orr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaughlin v. NDOC et al
as 2:2018cv01562
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Secretary of State Ross Miller, Jim Gibbons and others
Plaintiff:
Michael T. McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Almy v. Adams et al
as 3:2017cv00382
Defendant:
G. Yates, Lt. Minor Adams, R. Aranas and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Almy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Almy v. Minor Adams, et al
as 16-17289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN ALMY
Defendant - Appellee:
MINOR ADAMS, DR. ARANAS, R. BAKER and others
Kevin Almy v. Minor Adams, et al
as 16-17286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN ALMY
Defendant - Appellee:
MINOR ADAMS, DR. ARANAS, R. BAKER and others
Edward Seely v. Jim Gibbons, et al
as 12-15386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD E. SEELY
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM GIBBONS, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, Esquire, ROSS MILLER, Secretary of State and others
David Johnson v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 11-17428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN SANDOVAL, ROSS MILLER, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
