Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Elizabeth Carley v. Attorney General for the State of Nevada, et al
as 22-16965
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELIZABETH CARLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA, JERRY HOWELL, Warden and CHARLES DANIELS, Director, Nevada Department of Corrections
Respondent:
NDOC/FMWCC and JO GENTRY, Warden
Clyde Lewis v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 22-16547
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLYDE LEWIS, AKA Louis Randolph
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES DZURENDA, Director, NDOC, BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, Sr., Warden, SDCC, MINOR ADAMS, Asst. Warden, SDCC and others
Ana Ocegueda v. State of Nevada, et al
as 22-15759
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANA OCEGUEDA
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, JO GENTRY, Warden, FMWCC, CATHERINE CORTEZ-MASTO and others
George Vontress v. State of Nevada, et al
as 22-15666
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE LESLIE VONTRESS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, JAMES DZURENDA, D. W. NEVENS and others
Matthews v Williams, et al.,
as 3:2021cv00320
Plaintiff:
Ivan Lee Matthews and Ivan Lee Matthews, II
Defendant:
Brian Williams, Warden Nevens, Jo Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Gentry et al
as 2:2020cv00217
Defendant:
Linda Fox, Filomp, Michael Minev and others
Plaintiff:
William L Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2019cv01729
Plaintiff:
Clyde Lewis and Louis Randolph
Defendant:
M. Travis, James Dzurenda, Timothy Filson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Gentry et al
as 2:2019cv01661
Respondent:
Jo Gentry and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Steven C Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matlean v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2019cv01498
Defendant:
J. Edmerson, B Greigo, T. Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
James K. Matlean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2019cv01263
Defendant:
G Piccinnini, Naphcare LLC, Dr Vicuna and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
