Cases 21 - 30 of 286
JOANNE DENNIS v. TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv66289
Plaintiff:
JOANNE DENNIS
Defendant:
TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION , TODD PACIFIC SHIPYARDS CORPORATION , NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIPBUILDING INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOREMAN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64364
Plaintiff:
JOHN W BOREMAN and JOANN BOREMAN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUMALAINEN et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv64907
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HUMALAINEN and JOANN HUMANLAINEN
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GODDARD et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64991
Plaintiff:
RILEY S GODDARD and JOANNE L GODDARD
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALLECK et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv66123
Plaintiff:
JOANNE HALLECK and JO ANN HALLECK
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, FLINTKOTE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOLFE et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv66100
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WOLFE and JOANN WOLFE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MUNTEAN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65489
Plaintiff:
JOANN MUNTEAN and AUREL MUNTEAN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EARLEY et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65740
Plaintiff:
ROGER F EARLEY and JOANN EARLEY
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BATTLES et al v. ABEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65058
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G BATTLES and A JOANN BATTLES
Defendant:
ABEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CANADAY v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65204
Plaintiff:
JOANN CANADAY
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
