Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Francis Grandinetti, II v. Nolan Espinda, et al
as 17-16070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS ANTHONY GRANDINETTI II
Defendant - Appellee:
NOLAN P. ESPINDA, Warden, Director - Department of Public Safety, CATHY ROSS, Deputy Director - Admin, JODIE MAESAKA-HIRATA, Deputy Director - Corrections and FDC/MCU and others
Williams v. Ige et al
as 1:2017cv00222
Plaintiff:
Maunu Renah Williams
Defendant:
David Y. Ige, Tommy Johnson, Jodie Maesaka-Hirata and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardines v. Espinda
as 1:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
Kurt Russell Cardines
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda , Jodie Maesaka-Hirata , Peter Cabreros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v Espinda et al
as 1:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
Michael Kaonohi Perry, Jr.
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda , Jodie Maesaka-Hirata , Peter Cabreros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Tuitama et al
as 1:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pitts
Defendant:
Tuitama, Jodie Maesaka-Hirata, Nolan Espinda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Espinda, et al.
as 1:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Defendant:
Nolan P. Espinda, Cathy Ross, Jodie Maesaka-Hirata and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Jinbo et al
as 1:2016cv00674
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Defendant:
Scott Jinbo, Howard Komori, Shari Kimoto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abraham v. Espinda
as 1:2016cv00656
Plaintiff:
Verece Abraham
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda, Jodie Maesaka-Hirata, Peter Cabreros and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zachary Smith v. Nolan Espinda, et al.
as 1:2016cv00519
Plaintiff:
Zachary Smith
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda, Jodie Maesaka-Hirata, Peter Cabreros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2014cv00432
Defendant:
State of Hawaii , Mark Patterson , Jodie Maesaka-Hirata and others
Plaintiff:
Stormy Rae Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
