Labor Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Ted Kubala, Jr., et al v. Supreme Production Svcs, Inc.
as 16-40892
Plaintiff - Appellee: JON CARTER, COLLINS R. GANSON, TRENTON SCHULZE and others
Defendant - Appellant: SUPREME PRODUCTION SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Rowdy Leal, et al v. Paramount Restaurants Grp, Inc, et al
as 14-10136
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROWDY LEAL, et ux, Angela Leal, individuals, and on behalf of other similarly situated, SIGIFREDO CISNEROS, Individuals, and on behalf of others similarly situated, TIMOTHY J. HEIDER, Individuals, and on behalf of others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: PARAMOUNT RESTAURANTS GROUP, INCORPORATED, a Texas Corporation, formerly known as Strickland Restaurants, Incorporated, STRICKLAND RESTAURANTS, INCORPORATED, Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) #002, SCRATCH COOKIN, INCORPORATED, a Texas Corporation and others
Rowdy Leal v. Paramount Restaurants Grp, Inc
as 14-10136
Plaintiff / Appellant: Rowdy Leal, et ux, Angela Leal, individuals, and on behalf of other similarly situated, Sigifredo Cisneros, Individuals, and on behalf of others similarly situated, Timothy J. Heider, Individuals, and on behalf of others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Paramount Restaurants Group, Incorporated, a Texas Corporation, formerly known as Strickland Restaurants, Incorporated, Strickland Restaurants, Incorporated, Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) #002, Scratch Cookin, Incorporated, a Texas Corporation and others
Selma Roadhouse Companeros, et al v. Rowdy Leal, et al
as 13-50878
Plaintiff - Appellee: SELMA ROADHOUSE COMPANEROS, LTD. and RESTAURANT LAND INVESTMENT, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant: ROWDY LEAL, SIGIFREDO CISNEROS, TIMOTHY J. HEIDER and others
Frank Stoffels, et al v. SBC Communications, Inc., et al
as 12-50688
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANK STOFFELS, on Behalf of the SBC Telephone Concession Plan and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, LINDA VILLAFANE, on behalf of the SBC Telephone Concession Plan and all other persons similarly situated, JAMES BELCHER, on behalf of the SBC Concession Plan and all other persons similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: SBC COMMUNICATIONS, INC., SBC TELEPHONE CONCESSION PLAN and A T, formerly known as SBC Communications, Inc.
Frank Stoffels, et al v. SBC Communications, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-50148
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANK STOFFELS, on Behalf of the SBC Telephone Concession Plan and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, JAMES BELCHER, on Behalf of the SBC Concession Plan and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, BURNIE JOE DUNN, on Behalf of the SBC Concession Plan and All Other Persons Similarly Situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: SBC COMMUNICATIONS, INC., SBC TELEPHONE CONCESSION PLAN and AT&T, formerly known as SBC Communications, Inc.
Jowell Bullard, et al v. BWXT Pantex, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-10470
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOWELL C. BULLARD, on his own behalf and for all others similarly situated, NORRIS RAY TOLLERSON, JR., on his own behalf and for all others similarly situated, RANDY STOKES, JR., on his behalf and for all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellant: BWXT PANTEX LLC
Joe Garcia v. Best Buy Stores, L.P., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-20243
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOE RENE GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee: BEST BUY STORES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and OCCUPATIONAL BENEFITS PLAN FOR THE TEXAS EMPLOYEES OF BEST BUY STORES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Raymond Songer, et al v. Dillon Resources, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-10803
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAYMOND KEITH SONGER, CROX ALVARADO, VICTOR ARRINGTON and others
Defendant - Appellee: DILLON RESOURCES, INC., SUNSET LOGISTICS, INC. and SUNSET ENNIS, INC., doing business as Sunset Waxahaxie, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?