Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DOE
as 1:2017cv02425
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
LOVERN v. GEITHNER et al
as 1:2012cv01741
Plaintiff: PRESCOTT LOVERN
Defendant: TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER , DAVID S. COHEN , JAMES H. FREIS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
CARIK et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00272
Plaintiff: JOSEPH M. CARIK , JAMES BEADNELL , JOY BEADNELL and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES , KATHLEEN SEBELIUS , UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
USA v. 8 Gilcrease Lane, Quincy, Flor, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-5061
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant - Appellee: 8 Gilcrease Lane, Quincy, Florida 32351, One Condo Located On North Ocean Boulevard In Myrtle Beach, South Carolina and All Funds Including Approximately $53 Million, On Deposit At Bank Of America Accounts Of (1) Thomas A. Bowdoin, Jr., , (2) Clarence Busby, Jr. & Dawn Stowers,& (3) Golden Panda Ad Builder, Thomas A. Bowdoin, Jr., Sole Proprietor, dba Adsurfdaily; Clarenc
Claimant - Appellant: Adsurfdaily, Inc., Thomas A. Bowdoin and Bowdoin Harris Enterprises, Inc.
Claimant - Appellee: Golden Panda Ad Builder, Clarence Busby, Michael Haws and others
LIFENET, INC. v. MUSCULOSKELETAL TRANSPLANT FOUNDATION
as 1:2007mc00224
Plaintiff: LIFENET, INC.
Defendant: MUSCULOSKELETAL TRANSPLANT FOUNDATION
Movant: VAISHALI UDUPA and JOHN HALE
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
NOVAK v. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
as 1:2007mc00212
Plaintiff: DOMINIC NOVAK
Defendant: CAPITAL MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Respondent: JOHN HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceeding

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?