Cases 1 - 10 of 11
THOMPSON v. CREEKSIDE AT MACON LLC
as 5:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
RAMONA THOMPSON
Defendant:
CREEKSIDE AT MACON LLC and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
TURNER v. TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
DAVID PHILLIP TURNER
Defendant:
TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY, JOHN DOES and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
COX v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 7:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
BETTY COX
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WARREN v. BIG LOTS STORES, INC. et al
as 5:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
SEMETRIS WARREN
Defendant:
BIG LOTS STORES, INC., SUMMIT AT THE MALL SHOPPING CENTER, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
WIG STUDIO 1 LLC v. HERSHEY et al
as 3:2021cv00025
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Heather Hershey an individual and sole proprietorship doing business as CysterWigs and JOHN DOES
Plaintiff:
Wig Studio 1, LLC and WIG STUDIO 1 LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
COOPER v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 5:2017cv00238
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Plaintiff:
NORMA COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEBB v. DOLGENCORP LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
SHARON WEBB
Defendant:
DOLGENCORP LLC , PEPSICO INC , PEPSICO SALES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
WATSON-HILL v. Does 1-10 et al
as 5:2016cv00496
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH WATSON-HILL
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and MURPHY OIL USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TOWNS v. WAL-MART STORES INC et al
as 5:2016cv00415
Plaintiff:
CURTIS TOWNS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. DEVEREAUX et al
as 5:2016cv00392
Defendant:
NAOMI DEVEREAUX, The Kroger Co. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
