Cases 31 - 40 of 632
Jimenez v. Vitalant et al
as 1:2022cv03331
Plaintiff:
Luis Jimenez
Defendant:
Vitalant and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kalkbrenner v. Chao et al
as 1:2022cv01341
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA KALKBRENNER
Defendant:
STANLEY CHAO, FIRST LOAN, UNKNOWN ACH PROCESSOR and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Shulruff Dental, Inc. v. Parnell Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
Shulruff Dental, Inc.
Defendant:
Parnell Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and John Does,1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Qualls v. Anong LLC dba Availblue et al
as 1:2021cv06598
Plaintiff:
Tyanna Qualls and John Does 1-10
Defendant:
Anong LLC dba Availblue, LDF Holdings, LLC, Jessi Lee Phillips Lorenzo and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Gerber v. Medcubics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06394
Plaintiff:
Dr. Robert Gerber
Defendant:
Medcubics, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Pollack v. Capital Accounts, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv06221
Plaintiff:
Dr. William Pollack
Defendant:
Capital Accounts, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Romero v. Arnold Scott Harris P.C. et al
as 1:2021cv06153
Plaintiff:
Sean Romero
Defendant:
Arnold Scott Harris P.C. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Agha v. Shore Funding Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06101
Plaintiff:
Mazen Hasan Agha
Defendant:
Shore Funding Solutions, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05816
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Animal Medical Center of Orland Park, Inc. v. Graham et al
as 1:2021cv05620
Plaintiff:
Animal Medical Center of Orland Park, Inc.
Defendant:
Michele Graham doing business as Wholeful Pet and John Does, 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
