Cases 1 - 10 of 17
BISHOP v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 1:2023cv24376
Plaintiff:
SCOTT BISHOP
Defendant:
DEFENDANT 1, JOHN DOES 1 -20 and SELINA HSU
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
STILWELL v. DEFENDANT "1" et al.,
as 1:2023cv21920
Defendant:
CHARLES LESLIE STILWELL, DEFENDANT 1 and JOHN DOES 1 - 20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SUN v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 1:2023cv21855
Defendant:
DIN YUAN STEVEN SUN, DEFENDANT 1, JOHN DOES 1 - 20 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DUBEY v. DEFENDANT "1" et al.,
as 1:2023cv21840
Plaintiff:
SHIKHA DUBEY
Defendant:
DEFENDANT "1" and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
v. SUN et al
as 1:2023cv21854
Defendant:
DIN YUAN STEVEN SUN, DEFENDANT 1 and JOHN DOES 1- 20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
POLANSKY v. Defendants "1", et al
as 1:2023cv21852
Defendant:
BRUCE JAE POLANSKY, Defendant 1 and JOHN DOES 1 - 20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BANDYOPADHYAY v. Defendant 1 et al
as 1:2022cv22907
Defendant:
Defendant 1, SUXIA OBEI, Sasha and others
Plaintiff:
RANGAN BANDYOPADHYAY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DUBEY v. Defendant "1" et al
as 1:2022cv22551
Plaintiff:
SHIKHA DUBEY
Defendant:
Defendant "1", JOHN DOES 1 - 20, Defendant 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Amazon.com, Inc. et al v. WDC Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2021cv24242
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Defendant:
Amazon Data Services, Inc., WDC Holdings LLC dba Northstar, Commercial Partners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Amazon.com, Inc. et al v. WDC Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2021mc24242
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Data Services, Inc.
Defendant:
WDC Holdings LLC doing business as Northstar Commercial Partners, Brian Watson, Sterling NCP FF, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
