Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Kenworthy et al
as 1:2022cv03728
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Eric Kenworthy, MD, Eric Kenworthy MD (A Sole Proprietorship), Eric Kenworthy (A Sole Proprietorship) and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2022cv03475
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Denny Xavier Rodriguez, M.D., DXR Medical Service, P.C., John Doe Defendants "1" through "10" and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Vine et al
as 1:2022cv02965
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Mark H Vine, M.D., Mark H Vine MD doing business as Mark Vine MD (A Sole Proprietorship), Yana Marinovich and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Karin Gepp, Ph.D. (A Sole Proprietorship) et al
as 1:2022cv02860
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Karin Gepp, Ph.D. (A Sole Proprietorship), Gepp Psychological Services, PLLC, Karin Gepp and others
Petitioner:
Law Office of Eitan Dagan P.C.
Respondent:
Vladislav Stoyanovsky
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Time to Care Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02158
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Time to Care Pharmacy, Inc., Michael Tabulov and John Doe Nos. "1' through "10"
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Jiankang Leasing Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01484
Defendant:
Maxym Fesler, Jiankang Leasing Inc., Maksym Fesler and others
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Masood et al
as 1:2022cv01215
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Faisal Masood, D.C., Masood Chiropractic Diagnostic, P.C., Gentle Touch Chiropractic Care PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Dorsten et al
as 1:2021cv05565
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Joseph Dorsten, D.O., Lifeline Medical Imaging, P.C., Hillside Primary Medical Care, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
287 Franklin Avenue Residents' v. Meisels
as 16-3675
Plaintiff:
287 Franklin Avenue Residents' Association, by Jon Sasmoor, President, Lisa Lin, Willie Osterweil and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jon Sasmor
Defendant - Appellee:
Chaim Meisels, AKA Cliamah Mizelle, Chaim Goldberg, AKA Henry Goldberg, Isaac Teitelbaum, AKA Isaac Titalbaum and others
Defendant:
Ronald Henry, Joe Doe, John and Jane Does, #2 Through # 10, AKA John and Jane Does, #1 Through #10 and others
Zegelstein et al v. Chaudhry, M.D. et al
as 1:2016cv03090
Plaintiff:
Zegelstein, Ricky Zegelstein, M.D., Custom Anesthesia Services, P.C. and others
Defendant:
Chaudhry, M.D, Michael J. Faust, M.D., Vcarve, LLC and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Michael P Krumholz, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
