Cases 1 - 6 of 6
City of Philadelphia Board of, et al v. Robert Eckert, et al
as 08-56462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA BOARD OF PENSIONS, Derivatively on Behalfof Mattel, Inc., SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY and RETIREMENT BOARD OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Plaintiff:
ASBESTOS WORKERS LOCAL 14 PENSION FUND
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT A. ECKERT, MICHAEL J. DOLAN, FRANCES FERGUSSON and others
Asbestos Workers Local 14 Pension Fund v. Eckert et al
as 2:2007cv07101
Plaintiff:
Asbestos Workers Local 14 Pension Fund
Defendant:
Robert Eckert, Michael Dolan, Frances D Fergusson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Retirement Board of Allegheny County et al v. Eugene P Beard et al
as 2:2007cv07022
Plaintiff:
Retirement Board of Allegheny County, Retirement Board of Allegheny County, Retirement Board of Allegheny County and others
Defendant:
Eugene P Beard, Michael J Dolan, Robert A Eckert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions v. Robert A Eckert et al
as 2:2007cv06613
Plaintiff:
City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions, City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions, City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and others
Defendant:
Robert A Eckert, Michael J Dolan, Frances Fergusson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Howard Lasker v. John W Amerman et al
as 2:2007cv00654
Plaintiff:
Howard Lasker, Howard Lasker, Howard Lasker and others
Defendant:
John W Amerman, Jill E Barad, James A Eskridge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sherry M Tedeschi v. John W Amerman et al
as 2:2007cv00538
Plaintiff:
Sherry M Tedeschi, Sherry M Tedeschi and Sherry M Tedeschi
Defendant:
John W Amerman, John W Amerman, John W Amerman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
